<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SD/NP 13/08/2008 &#8211; Fantastic Eight, Recon 2022, And (H+K)2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/</link>
	<description>the high road to nowhere</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/comment-page-1/#comment-1789</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 09:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixsight.net/?p=634#comment-1789</guid>
		<description>Cool looking forward to the verdict.  The only other condition I put on my mildly enjoying Electra is that I&#039;m not generally a big reader of her book anyway so I wasn&#039;t offended by deviations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool looking forward to the verdict.  The only other condition I put on my mildly enjoying Electra is that I&#8217;m not generally a big reader of her book anyway so I wasn&#8217;t offended by deviations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Papaconstantinou</title>
		<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/comment-page-1/#comment-1788</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Papaconstantinou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixsight.net/?p=634#comment-1788</guid>
		<description>Okay, Daredevil Director&#039;s Cut/Elektra combo on the way from Play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, Daredevil Director&#8217;s Cut/Elektra combo on the way from Play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/comment-page-1/#comment-1787</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixsight.net/?p=634#comment-1787</guid>
		<description>I wrote about Electra a while ago, it feels like an average pilot episode but it certainly isn&#039;t as bad as some make it out to be, there are one or two shots that stand out as really well done.

Even Daredevil wasn&#039;t as bad as a lot of people seem to make it out to be. 

But yeah I think Rol is right too, I would like to see a Fantastic Four film where they are all comfortable in their powers and actually fight something that uses them all to their full potential.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about Electra a while ago, it feels like an average pilot episode but it certainly isn&#8217;t as bad as some make it out to be, there are one or two shots that stand out as really well done.</p>
<p>Even Daredevil wasn&#8217;t as bad as a lot of people seem to make it out to be. </p>
<p>But yeah I think Rol is right too, I would like to see a Fantastic Four film where they are all comfortable in their powers and actually fight something that uses them all to their full potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Papaconstantinou</title>
		<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/comment-page-1/#comment-1786</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Papaconstantinou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixsight.net/?p=634#comment-1786</guid>
		<description>Thinking about it, Rol&#039;s points on the dismissal of the Thing in the sequel are quite valid - they settle too quickly on him as more content with his lot, and leave him in the background, which really, considering how good a job Chiklis did on the character, is a real shame.

Daredevil, I need to rewatch, but remember being pleasantly entertained for the length of it, but not really having any impression of it afterwards, which isn&#039;t a bad thing, but isn&#039;t a good one either! Elektra I never saw, so maybe I need to double-bill those bad boys...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thinking about it, Rol&#8217;s points on the dismissal of the Thing in the sequel are quite valid &#8211; they settle too quickly on him as more content with his lot, and leave him in the background, which really, considering how good a job Chiklis did on the character, is a real shame.</p>
<p>Daredevil, I need to rewatch, but remember being pleasantly entertained for the length of it, but not really having any impression of it afterwards, which isn&#8217;t a bad thing, but isn&#8217;t a good one either! Elektra I never saw, so maybe I need to double-bill those bad boys&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/comment-page-1/#comment-1784</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixsight.net/?p=634#comment-1784</guid>
		<description>It is rare that I ever read someone not taking the cynical high ground when it comes to the Fantastic Four films, I generally agree with the majority of what you&#039;ve said here.

I worry that after the deserved success of the Dark Knight that they will all be tempted to &#039;Nolan&#039; up the comic book movies.

Fantastic Four is a product of its source material which is a generally light science fiction series with colourful characters who do very visually exciting things.

I love drawing The Thing even though the character doesn&#039;t really interest me because he just looks fantastic on the page.

I think the Fantastic Four look great in the movie, I think it is reasonably good casting with some great special effects.

The first story is light but easily lifted from the pages of FF, the sequel probably not as inspired - although I don&#039;t think I can forgive Reed getting jiggy with it.

I too don&#039;t dislike the effect that they used on Galactus as I can&#039;t imagine how that would transcribe to the big screen.

I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on Daredevil and Electra too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is rare that I ever read someone not taking the cynical high ground when it comes to the Fantastic Four films, I generally agree with the majority of what you&#8217;ve said here.</p>
<p>I worry that after the deserved success of the Dark Knight that they will all be tempted to &#8216;Nolan&#8217; up the comic book movies.</p>
<p>Fantastic Four is a product of its source material which is a generally light science fiction series with colourful characters who do very visually exciting things.</p>
<p>I love drawing The Thing even though the character doesn&#8217;t really interest me because he just looks fantastic on the page.</p>
<p>I think the Fantastic Four look great in the movie, I think it is reasonably good casting with some great special effects.</p>
<p>The first story is light but easily lifted from the pages of FF, the sequel probably not as inspired &#8211; although I don&#8217;t think I can forgive Reed getting jiggy with it.</p>
<p>I too don&#8217;t dislike the effect that they used on Galactus as I can&#8217;t imagine how that would transcribe to the big screen.</p>
<p>I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on Daredevil and Electra too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/comment-page-1/#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:52:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixsight.net/?p=634#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I saw your question when I was first getting the plugin. 

I&#039;m new to this myself, so I can&#039;t say I really know. I do know what you mean though, might have to to be done with frames I think, or some other type of HTML code, might wanna look into HTML tags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I saw your question when I was first getting the plugin. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m new to this myself, so I can&#8217;t say I really know. I do know what you mean though, might have to to be done with frames I think, or some other type of HTML code, might wanna look into HTML tags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Papaconstantinou</title>
		<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/comment-page-1/#comment-1778</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Papaconstantinou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 16:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixsight.net/?p=634#comment-1778</guid>
		<description>Hi, Tom,

No problems on being off-topic. I may have had some threaded comments problems a year or so back, but my only main problem at the moment is the issue - which is probably down to my theme&#039;s CSS, that means that I can&#039;t get my images to go properly inline (I think is the term) with the text.

What I &lt;i&gt;want&lt;/i&gt; is a news article style layout, where the writing wraps around the images, on these review posts. What &lt;i&gt;actually&lt;/i&gt; happens is - well - not that. A mess.

Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Tom,</p>
<p>No problems on being off-topic. I may have had some threaded comments problems a year or so back, but my only main problem at the moment is the issue &#8211; which is probably down to my theme&#8217;s CSS, that means that I can&#8217;t get my images to go properly inline (I think is the term) with the text.</p>
<p>What I <i>want</i> is a news article style layout, where the writing wraps around the images, on these review posts. What <i>actually</i> happens is &#8211; well &#8211; not that. A mess.</p>
<p>Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/comment-page-1/#comment-1777</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 13:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixsight.net/?p=634#comment-1777</guid>
		<description>Hi there, I just read that you had problems with your commenting not being threaded, but you said you resolved this problem? I&#039;m using WP-THREAD COMMENT with AJAX, could it be because of the layout? I&#039;m new to this stuff, much appreciated if any tips and help. (sorry to reply to your site here and off the topic as well)
-Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there, I just read that you had problems with your commenting not being threaded, but you said you resolved this problem? I&#8217;m using WP-THREAD COMMENT with AJAX, could it be because of the layout? I&#8217;m new to this stuff, much appreciated if any tips and help. (sorry to reply to your site here and off the topic as well)<br />
-Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicolas Papaconstantinou</title>
		<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/comment-page-1/#comment-1774</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Papaconstantinou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 13:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixsight.net/?p=634#comment-1774</guid>
		<description>I quite liked their iteration of Galactus - although they chose to leave the science of it all quite vague, it was pretty similar to the version Warren Ellis used over in the Marvel universe, and while I&#039;m glad Galactus as gigantic, ostentatiously outfitted humanoid exists in the traditional MU, I think it&#039;s one of those ideas that suggests revision in a modern take.

A giant squid god or something would be better, but also probably a little too sensitive, trademark-wise!

Thinking about it, I probably agree with everything else you said about the sequel, but I think I didn&#039;t notice those problems so much because of the back-to-back viewing - the poppiness, shortness and throwaway nature of them meant that they merged into one experience, watched that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite liked their iteration of Galactus &#8211; although they chose to leave the science of it all quite vague, it was pretty similar to the version Warren Ellis used over in the Marvel universe, and while I&#8217;m glad Galactus as gigantic, ostentatiously outfitted humanoid exists in the traditional MU, I think it&#8217;s one of those ideas that suggests revision in a modern take.</p>
<p>A giant squid god or something would be better, but also probably a little too sensitive, trademark-wise!</p>
<p>Thinking about it, I probably agree with everything else you said about the sequel, but I think I didn&#8217;t notice those problems so much because of the back-to-back viewing &#8211; the poppiness, shortness and throwaway nature of them meant that they merged into one experience, watched that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rol</title>
		<link>http://nixsight.net/2008/08/sdnp-13082008-fantastic-eight-recon-2022-and-hk2/comment-page-1/#comment-1773</link>
		<dc:creator>Rol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nixsight.net/?p=634#comment-1773</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the first FF - with similar reservations to you... but the second was a big disappointment. They threw away the Thing&#039;s character, played Reed for laughs too much, and Galactus was woeful. Only Johnny was any good, but (even after a lukewarm reception to the first one), I expected so much more from it. Doubt there&#039;ll be another... time they let Marvel have the rights back and start again from scratch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the first FF &#8211; with similar reservations to you&#8230; but the second was a big disappointment. They threw away the Thing&#8217;s character, played Reed for laughs too much, and Galactus was woeful. Only Johnny was any good, but (even after a lukewarm reception to the first one), I expected so much more from it. Doubt there&#8217;ll be another&#8230; time they let Marvel have the rights back and start again from scratch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

