- Good day. Did big grocery shop, hung out with Girl One, & watched films. Also, BBC repeating The Office with new interviews – spot on! #
- Actually, a bit of unexpected Outnumbered & The Office really does do one a power of good. #
- A question about new TV: Have I got settings wrong, or does one just have to get used to motion-blur with flat-screens? It is distracting. #
- UNbelievable. I have a really bad feeling about this motion-blur issue. Does anybody have experience of dealing with it? #
- @RedMummy The manual is next to useless, to be honest. It's for use across about two dozen different models. in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy I'm looking through those at the moment. Was just hoping someone on here might have experience that isn't buried in a forum. in reply to RedMummy #
- @georgelondon I don't know if I'll ever get used to it!
Am looking at AV forum, trying to work out some things to work out… in reply to georgelondon #
2009-08-31 Digital Breadcrumbs
2009-08-30 Digital Breadcrumbs
- @SorenLorensen Oasis were still together? Hm. I remember them releasing "Don't Look Back In Anger" & then it's all a blur. Not a Blur. #
- Well, I've gone from good to frankly foul mood in ten short minutes. Not EVEN sure why. Looks like time to play games… #
SD/Films – RockNRolla, Shoot ‘Em Up & Inglourious Basterds
Righto. So, three films in the last week, all of them guns and glory, and not one of them with a properly written title. Excellent.
Rock N Rolla
I’ve got a soft spot for “Lock Stock & Two Smoking Barrels”, and I recall enjoying “Snatch”, though I’ve never felt the need to watch it again, but Guy Ritchie has become a bit of a figure of fun for the world at large in recent years, and that’s made it hard to see his particular ouvre of mockney gangster movies as having any authenticity any more, if they really had any to
begin with in the first place.
I guess that’s why I hadn’t rushed to see “Rock N Rolla” when it came out. I’d heard only bad things about “Revolver”, and can be suggestible about such things.
It’s a shame, really, because “Rock N Rolla” is quite fun. Granted, it’s got a similar convoluted caper plot to “Lock Stock…” and “Snatch”, and does about as much to realistically represent organised crime in London as “Oceans Eleven” does for career thieves. Or “Finding Nemo” did for sea life.
2009-08-29 Digital Breadcrumbs
- @georgelondon It… doesn't. Was just preoccupied with the internet. We had pizza in the end, with Oke & Matt. in reply to georgelondon #
- Girl One is finishing off a game of Mario Kart with Matt, & then it's Royal Tannenbaums. G1 just thrashed us at Settlers Of Catan. #
- @Wossy BIG fan of the franchise, so anticipating a lot of fun. The opening disasters are always awesome in them. (My favourite is in FD2) in reply to Wossy #
- Just spent half an hour looking for my fucking birth certificate. I can picture it right now, but we didn't find the damn thing! #
- I wouldn't have any real problems with idea of ID cards if I wasn't certain the gov would find a way to make them functionally useless. #
- @nicktheowl Oh, it's utterly a stupid idea – & I'm coming from a fairly conservative viewpoint on this subject, too. in reply to nicktheowl #
- @georgelondon @purseonality Neither of you has the slightest clue where my Birth Certificate is, do you? #
- G1 & I just did the notice of marriage thing! They let us do it even though I didn't have my birth certificate, which was swell! Now, hm… #
- …New Forest with the dog? We are thinking park up in Ashurst, wander around. If you have any better ideas, tell me RIGHT NOW. #
- @acheverton in reply to acheverton #
- @acheverton Perfect response! in reply to acheverton #
2009-08-28 Digital Breadcrumbs
- @SorenLorensen To be fair, we weren't ACTUALLY drinking all the way to six. Pretty sure we stopped around about… 5? #
- @SorenLorensen That, incidentally, the birthday card thing…? Is brilliant! in reply to SorenLorensen #
- @SorenLorensen Wow. Really? That's actually pretty damn impressive. Considering I made it to work for 10! in reply to SorenLorensen #
- @SorenLorensen Hm… it's one of the few areas of masculine physical endeavour where I really excel, I suppose. That, and eating. Well, and in reply to SorenLorensen #
- @SorenLorensen Catching up, hours behind. You gals had fun last night, huh? Candlelit shower n'all! Awkward but Awesome! #
- @SorenLorensen And a new profile picture, too? One that… looks like there's a story behind it? in reply to SorenLorensen #
- @RedMummy Slept TOO well, last night. The more I sleep, the more I need, the more tired I feel the next day. It is retarded. in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy I was around to hear that was imminent. What does he do again? in reply to RedMummy #
- @samwisemoss Ooooh, I say! Wait… not that sort of camping? in reply to samwisemoss #
- Wonder if I can convince Girl One to have Chinese takeaway tonight… #
- Is it odd that despite never finding Carrie Fisher attractive, I never seem to get tired of seeing women in that Leia Slave Girl outfit? #
- …The Slave Leia thing never effected me at the time, but women dressed as her really appeals. #
- @Specsneedaclean That's actually REALLY strange… in reply to Specsneedaclean #
- @kmellon Fair play to whoever designed it… it certainly worked on me! in reply to kmellon #
- Today I have all but decided that if I ever cosplay as anyone, it will be as @mrtonylee. #
2009-08-27 Digital Breadcrumbs
- @georgelondon This isn't fear… this is the knowledge that neither you nor @Sulman is craven enough to betray my trust & faith like that.:) in reply to georgelondon #
- @georgelondon Heh… not even remotely! in reply to georgelondon #
- Joking aside, I think whole practical joke culture, & ball-breaking stag-night shockery only really works right if there's all-party buy-in, #
- …If the subject of it doesn't really appreciate the culture, & wouldn't do it back, it's really just bullying. Been there, done that..! #
- …It's not something I'm interested in repeating. Having all family at wedding is going to be QUITE ENOUGH of a hazing, thankyouverymuch. #
- @georgelondon Yes, I see. What you're actually describing there is "bullying". Or "ritualised humiliation". I say again – no thank you!
in reply to georgelondon # - @SoullaStylianou Yes, getting married. Nope, no pinning money, I'm afraid! in reply to SoullaStylianou #
- @georgelondon Don't worry, @Sulman never forces himself on you. At least, it never FEELS like forcing… in reply to georgelondon #
- @SoullaStylianou It'd be wrong to do it when nothing else about the wedding is going to be Greek traditional. in reply to SoullaStylianou #
- @georgelondon Tut. How very provincial an attitude. It isn't ALL about sodomy, you know! And why do you assume it's forced? in reply to georgelondon #
- @mmetcalfe Ha! Probably, actually…! in reply to mmetcalfe #
- @SoullaStylianou Half the guests being Greek doesn't really change the fact that the bride isn't, & culturally neither am I, tho! I'd be… in reply to SoullaStylianou #
- @SoullaStylianou …Uncomfortable with it, to be honest. in reply to SoullaStylianou #
- UNbelievable! There isn't a current DVD version of Point Break available in the UK. What? WHAT? #
- @caitlinmoran I really, REALLY couldn't give a shit about sport. Also, I can talk loudest at a table, but can't compete for attention… in reply to caitlinmoran #
- @caitlinmoran …No particularly strong Alpha instinct. in reply to caitlinmoran #
- @SoullaStylianou I CAN dance, just not stuff with pre-determined steps. It isn't how my brain interacts with the music. In May 2010. in reply to SoullaStylianou #
- @SoullaStylianou …There's a possibility of couple of the traditional dances for the women, but not interested in setting off the men. in reply to SoullaStylianou #
- @georgelondon That's most likely, actually, thinking about it! I HOPE so… terrible oversight, otherwise! in reply to georgelondon #
- @SoullaStylianou Actually not even sure how big a dance floor we're going to have, to be honest! in reply to SoullaStylianou #
- @caitlinmoran I hate pretending to be feminist because at some point in our teens, it was decided we were all supposed to be now. Boy thing? in reply to caitlinmoran #
- @SoullaStylianou Had never heard of it. Now have seen it. Oh GOD no! That is like my worst nightmare come true! in reply to SoullaStylianou #
- @alydenisof Yay! Was thinking of you yesterday – specif. Hannigan/Caulfield scene in The Body was on a Whedon montage. Blew me away, again. #
- I posted about The Hurt Locker at Nixsight: http://bit.ly/GjE3j #
- Oh, also, I posted about The Road at Nixsight: http://bit.ly/nRKyV. Includes my patented method for avoiding book adaptation disappointment. #
- @SoullaStylianou I think it's things like that that encourage divorce! in reply to SoullaStylianou #
- @acheverton Sounds good, sirrah! in reply to acheverton #
- Right. Bed by half 12! Girl One starts new job tomorrow, so don't want to disrupt her chi any more than I have to… #
- @RedMummy Woah! Where did YOU appear from? in reply to RedMummy #
- RT @driis: Don't let actors tell you shit about anything important!! We make it up as the go along..
) # - 9 out of 10 Astronauts love Serious Sam HD: http://is.gd/2Bd7I #
- @Sulman Grrr… in reply to Sulman #
- http://is.gd/2Bf70 – Find it both endearing & concerning that Virgin America see tired sarcasm as the way to go with safety videos… #
- …But find it really endearing how proud the matador is that he's worked out the safety belt, & how unimpressed the bull is. #
- RT @Sulman: http://www.pbase.com/sulman/image/116546019 St Kinga's Chapel Wieliczka Salt Mine, 185 metres underground. It's awesome. #
- @Sulman Just rolled through about seven different responses to that in my head, then dismissed them. Those are jokes for lunchtime, I think! in reply to Sulman #
- Huh. Judd Apatow produced The Cable Guy, huh? I actually kinda like that film. #
- (The "actually kinda like" bit is because it failed commercially, not because I'm surprised Apatow made a film I liked…) #
- @Groonk Oh, I've enjoyed nearly all of them to some extent! in reply to Groonk #
- Ha! I totally forgot about the Legend Of Neil: http://is.gd/2BjS9 for Season 2. #
- RT @Sulman: Michael Bay eating a bowl of cereal http://bit.ly/nDFgb (This ACTUALLY makes me nostalgic for Michael Bay movies.) #
- Hey you guys! I wrote a story about greasy food & the future, over here: http://is.gd/2BsDF. It's called Dougie Lets Himself Go. #
- …If you like it, I'd love you to leave a comment, or share it with your friends. #
- @Sulman Think you were on holiday, so may have missed this: http://is.gd/2BtGG #
- @RedMummy A point to what? The piece? in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy Just responded to your response. Not important for reader to know exactly what I'm getting at… once it's theirs, it's theirs… in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy …but if you want to know what I meant, go back & read it, but this time consider that it may not be about suicide at all. in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy Not dense. I just don't think you've realised that I almost always write with a view to magic realism. in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy You're also making the assumption that I competently achieved whatever I was intending. I quite often drop the ball! in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy It… ISN'T suicide. At least, I didn't consider suicide as being the subject at any point in the writing or the re-reading. in reply to RedMummy #
- You are where you are because of who you are. This is something I really need to remember if I ever get too upset about work or play. #
- @RedMummy You're competing with it, is your problem – trying to define what it is. My intent wasn't commentary OR observational… in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy Consider: It's set in a greasy spoon because I liked the ambience of a greasy spoon, & that's better with smoke. in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy And most importantly, remember when I write, it's ALWAYS with a view to magic realism. And that I've probably just written badly. in reply to RedMummy #
- @budgie Exactly! At that moment in time was thinking more broadly about position in life. & think it's ok to rail against things that are… in reply to budgie #
- @budgie …inflicted at work that aren't part of acceptable working conditions. But at same time, if it gets bad enough, can always leave! in reply to budgie #
- @RedMummy Not at all. You said that if it was about suicide or health, it was flawed. I told you neither was my intention. That's all… in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy …I've just told you a few different ways, because I didn't think there was a mystery in the first place! in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy Do you want me to tell you "it's a horror story"? Okay, it's a horror story. Jeez. in reply to RedMummy #
- @SamShepherd Exactly my intention. Thankyou! Just to clarify, the something we don't know isn't that he's going to kill himself! #
- @RedMummy The narrator has told you the story that he knew. There really isn't more to it than that so being bossy with me won't change it! in reply to RedMummy #
- @SamShepherd Incidentally, I've never read those guys! I just seem to gravitate toward things being not quite right, but not quite genre… in reply to SamShepherd #
- …The post, incidentally, isn't even remotely original. Thinking about it, most heavily inspired by 1 of my 2 favourite X-Files episodes. #
- @idsharman Oh, yes, I agree. This is a more "on balance" thing, I think – an averaging out of life experiences… in reply to idsharman #
- Put another way: If life KEEPS shitting on you, it's possible that you might actually be standing in a toilet. #
- RT @Sulman: An absolutely magical set of iimages at the Globe this week http://bit.ly/13N9FV #
- @rhodri Tut, those whinging berks! in reply to rhodri #
- @TracyAnnO Hello! That The Road blog post I was blabbering about is finally up! http://is.gd/2BM9y. It's not really a review, mind. in reply to TracyAnnO #
- @JohnnyThomson2 Did you find the Mike Myers cameo distracting? I found the Mike Myers cameo REALLY distracting. in reply to JohnnyThomson2 #
- @ElleSergi Oh My God! Hello, you! in reply to ElleSergi #
- @SamShepherd Oh yes indeedy…! That's about the size of it in a nutshell… in reply to SamShepherd #
- @Sulman Are you following Mr Berry on here? He doesn't Tweet often, but when he does, it's ALWAYS upsetting. I mean, awesome. in reply to Sulman #
- @ElleSergi WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?!?!? (Hi!) in reply to ElleSergi #
- @SamShepherd A friend's boyfriend has a VERY similar voice to Sanchez… at least, as deep & vibrant. It makes me weak, is what it does… in reply to SamShepherd #
- http://is.gd/2BQs9 – The Prodigal Son Returns… #
- @hattiehattie (We knew what you meant…
) in reply to hattiehattie # - Neurosonics Audiomedical Labs Inc. – http://is.gd/2BRay #
- http://is.gd/2BRqu – Mr Wallace talks about games & Assassin's Creed 2. (That's @misterwallace) #
- Did I tell you all that I posted a blog about The Hurt Locker last night?: http://is.gd/2BVKe #
- (I DEFINITELY mentioned my post about The Road, yeah? http://is.gd/2BM9y) #
- RT @sarahditum: I made this! http://bit.ly/LjDxJ Videogames and government for @newstatesman. (Informative & smart… THANKS, Sarah!) #
- Just had a half-hearted crack at sorting through my follower list, seeing if I could weed out spammers. After 3 pages, I lost will to live. #
- @RedMummy If I say something private, I don't expect it to be repeated in public. That's common courtesy, really. Please don't do it. #
- @RedMummy Fair enough. I'll delete all tweets referring to it myself. in reply to RedMummy #
- @LeeConti But real people are dreadful! in reply to LeeConti #
- @LeeConti True that they've all got a story, but shocking how often it's one we've already heard!
Just once I want them to astound! … in reply to LeeConti # - @LeeConti …I mean, in a positive way, of course! in reply to LeeConti #
- @LeeConti Oh, man! You WOULD bring up OLD people… They're the one flaw in my reasoning. Nearly ALL of them have good stories… in reply to LeeConti #
- @LeeConti Girl One's grandad was projectionist for the military during WW2, I think. Tales of his travels fascinate me. in reply to LeeConti #
- @LeeConti (I'm being arch, of course – there is some merit to real stories. Just needs to be more filtering out of the mundane.) in reply to LeeConti #
- @steevbishop Don't use it often, but found myself agitated earlier on that they haven't worked out a way to make the ads contextual… in reply to steevbishop #
- @steevbishop …If I'm listening to Explosions In The Sky, it's fair to say I probably won't buy Rhianna or whoever the fuck it was… in reply to steevbishop #
- @steevbishop Hmm… maybe it's Amy McDonald I'm thinking of? It baffled me, tho – didn't announce itself, so I was left quite confused… in reply to steevbishop #
- @steevbishop Absolutely SHOULDN'T do… it's probably not great for the brand positioning when it's that intrusive… in reply to steevbishop #
- How fucking much have Blackberry spent on getting that U2 thing out there? It feels like everything I see online not on Youtube has it. #
- Dammit! Why doesn't So'ton have a Dr Sketchys? http://is.gd/2C6xu?? (Question primarily aimed at @steevbishop, @acheverton & @Eamon_) #
- @acheverton We should. But who will? I'm ALREADY "The guy who did Elephant Words" I can't do EVERYTHING. (It's gonna be me, isn't it?) in reply to acheverton #
- The Birth Of Stan Lee! (Not really SFW)! http://is.gd/2C89S! #
Books – The Road by Cormac McCarthy
I’m a little behind the herd when it comes to Cormac McCarthy‘s work. Despite watching and loving “No Country For Old Men“, I was totally oblivious to the fact that it wasn’t a Coen Brothers original until a few days later. Though I’ve heard stories about his mythical, apparently perfect novel “The Road“, I have to admit that the main reason I picked it up is because I heard about the imminent film of the book.
I’ve a standing rule that where possible, I’ll watch the film version of a story before I’ll read the book that it’s based on. Most of the time the, book is the original – and as such the intended, definitive – version, and generally this makes the book the purer, smarter version of the story. Or at least it’s difficult not to see it that way, if you encounter them in chronological order.
However, I think that a film can be a good example of its medium and still be a disappointing adaptation of a book. Knowing this isn’t enough, though – it’s really difficult to seperate the two in your head as you go. Even if you know that intellectually you should enjoy each on its merits, reading is a much more active mental and emotional process than watching a film, and after living a novel for the amount of time it takes to read it, it’s impossible not to have expectations when taking that experience into a cinema.
My feeling is that the effort to process all this while watching a movie is more hassle than it’s worth, so I reason that if I watch the film first, I’ll get to enjoy both. You have to be a certain sort of lunatic to retroactively dis-enjoy a film if when you eventually read the book you find it’s different – why would you do that to yourself? – and as I’m almost immune to plot-twists, it isn’t as if having a plot laid out for me in film is going to ruin my enjoyment of it in text.
(To clarify, I don’t mean that I’m immune to plot-twists because I work them out – I have never understood the desire to outsmart a story that so many people seem to have – it’s a story, people – it’s not a destination, it’s a ride. The way my mind works, it’s constantly ticking over possible places the story can go as I enjoy it, so a film falling in line with one of the vague thoughts I had about it is a pleasant buzz, not a groundbreaker.)
It’s one of hundreds of little tricks I use to make living among your species bearable – this way round, trying to work out why they made certain changes during the adaptation process can be an enjoyable exercise, rather than the disappointment spiral it can become if I’ve already got an emotional relationship with the original when I get to the copy.
So, anyway, that’s why I wasn’t going to read “The Road” before the film came out, but I’d heard so much about it that I put it on my birthday wish-list anyway, because I half expected not to get it till much later anyway.
When it turned up unexpectedly, my resolve held – it sat on the side with “No Country For Old Men” and “Let The Right One In”, waiting till some time in the distant future.
Films – The Hurt Locker
Despite appearances, “The Hurt Locker” is Kathryn Bigelow‘s return to familiar ground – the subject of addiction to adrenaline.
What differentiates this film from “Point Break“, however, is that where that film is a big, daft action movie, made for ease of use rather than use of brain, this one is a much more solemn and intense affair. Set in Iraq, the film follows a squad of bomb disposal experts, as they do their best to keep the streets, if not exactly danger free, at least free of planted explosives.
The film opens as tragedy hits the team, and are joined by a new team leader – Sergeant First Class William James, played by Jeremy Renner, who brings a sardonic edge to the over-confident and super-competent bomb disposal expert.
We’re trained by movies to expect certain things at this point – conflict between him and his new team as his maverick attitude puts them in danger, high-octane action set-pieces, bonding moments, and ultimately resolution as he proves himself to team-mates and audience alike.
Bigelow’s movie totally subverts everything we expect from it, almost wilfully daring the viewer to bitch about their thwarted expectations. Which is kind of mean when you consider how much her earlier work has done to create the expected modes in the first place!
What we get instead is a naturalistic, political or social agenda-free movie that follows its characters around as they do their jobs, in admittedly emotionally heightened conditions, rather than have them explain their actions.
2009-08-21 Digital Breadcrumbs
- How did we all end up looking so different? I find it easier to notice it in women, but still… #
- Our minds, countless synapses, provide so few surprises but faces, with very few variables, so many. #
- @douglasnoble Oh gosh… Those things both sound AWESOME! in reply to douglasnoble #
- @thepetshopboy Don't grow up! It's awesome being immature…! in reply to thepetshopboy #
- @bremxjones That looks SWEET… Is it out now? Is it? Ah, sorry – I can just check, can't I? in reply to bremxjones #
- @belle_lulu Heh… I felt a little like that was my fault. You guys weren't planning on superlate, were you? in reply to belle_lulu #
- @belle_lulu Well, I certainly enjoyed your & @SorenLorensen's company! Next day at work was a challenge, though! in reply to belle_lulu #
- Right… getting late, & have to make a decision between blogging & game playing. Too hot in this room to concentrate on writing, though. #
- @RedMummy Didn't but did. No game playing yet, but did write my Elephant Words piece for tomorrow. in reply to RedMummy #
- @belle_lulu Lady lady! That's not true at all! I will be reading your post tomorrow morning, for sure! For now, beddings! in reply to belle_lulu #
- @RedMummy I wrote for A blog. Just not the blog I was talking about! in reply to RedMummy #
- @belle_lulu This week has been all confusing sleep wise! I usually cope on only a few hours a night, but… Well, I think you guys broke me. in reply to belle_lulu #
- Morning all, by the way! Today is Girl One's last day at her current job… it is an emotionally mixed day for her, so am thinking of her. #
- …Or as Girl One's mum would have it, I am sending her my soldiers. #
- @mmetcalfe Zektivs are retard monkeys. in reply to mmetcalfe #
- @Specsneedaclean Oh, NICE. The little uniformed man isn't going to like your broomstick breath… in reply to Specsneedaclean #
- @MOMBTWEETS Tut. Grumpy. in reply to MOMBTWEETS #
- RT @rhodri: Steady on, Biggles. http://is.gd/2rqA7 (Teehee!) #
- @purseonality Hah… listening with interest… in reply to purseonality #
- RT @_arien: love this! Tweet for a cab. Please give 30mins notice @tweetalondoncab + check this 1st: http://bit.ly/QTqvc #
- @tim12s Uh… Really? What does it mean?? in reply to tim12s #
- @Specsneedaclean Sticky little hands, & broomstick breath? GORGEOUS! in reply to Specsneedaclean #
- @steevbishop What? Oh. Oooh. Oh wow. Good point. @tim12s, I got it now. Wow. How have I never noticed that…? I'm normally so disgusting. in reply to steevbishop #
- It has been brought to my attention that on occasion a chap might call his tadpoles… sorry, his sperm… his little soldiers… #
- …This is, I am relatively certain, not at ALL what Girl One's mum means. #
- So to clarify, I am NOT sending Girl One my sexy tadpoles on her leaving day… I am sending her my thoughtful thoughts. Ok? All cleared up? #
- Phew, glad we got that sperm mess all cleared up. #
- Rock out with our cocks out! Hang out with our wangs out! Uh… song out with our schlongs out? #
- @thoughtmecca Yu-huh? in reply to thoughtmecca #
- @thoughtmecca Blimey, has it been that long? @acheverton & I have been looking through the back-catalogue for various reasons ourselves… in reply to thoughtmecca #
- @thoughtmecca …personally I've been pleasantly surprised by some of the stuff I've written. And you're welcome cos you're awesome! in reply to thoughtmecca #
- @ememess That's nonsense. I'm going to disprove that if it takes me all morning researching online to do so. in reply to ememess #
- @thoughtmecca I know! You don't fish, you're just pragmatic about your work. As to 2nd drafts, oh yes. When I look at my stuff & like it… in reply to thoughtmecca #
- @thoughtmecca …It's as particularly perky first drafts, always! in reply to thoughtmecca #
- @laurennmcc Oh, lovely! in reply to laurennmcc #
- http://is.gd/2rvAG – The Wire character studies. Some of these are just quite nice pictures, but some are just fucking awesome. @Sulman. #
- @badmachinery A sad day indeed…
in reply to badmachinery # - Oh gosh. All those years of hearing about White Zombie & thinking I didn't know anything by them… Then I see this: http://is.gd/2rwhF... #
- @belle_lulu That's a BRILLIANT idea… I am going to e-mail her right now and tell her! in reply to belle_lulu #
- @belle_lulu Oh, ha! Actually, I thought you were talking about the spermy stuff that's going on. TOTALLY confused… in reply to belle_lulu #
- @louhellbaby Huh… How odd. Will look into that… in reply to louhellbaby #
- http://is.gd/2rwhF – Okay, @louhellbaby, try this? Should be a working link to that White Zombie More Human Than Human vid… #
- @belle_lulu No, wait, hang on… I meant the spermy stuff in my timeline this morning! in reply to belle_lulu #
- http://is.gd/2ry6q – Screamager, by Therapy? Backwhen, I loved this video. Considering it was just the band playing with hyperactive vid… #
- …I just thought it was the PERFECT way to do a "band playing the song" video. Lucky for me, EVERYBODY does most of this stuff now. Yay. #
- http://is.gd/2rytS – Senser, Age Of Panic. Listen, don't blame me. This is just what some of us LISTENED to in the 90s… #
- …Us middle-class kids were just SO… FUCKING… ANGRY! #
- @belle_lulu Catch up, missus… it was a whole THING. But that was SO two hours ago. in reply to belle_lulu #
- @belle_lulu I can't help that you're a sleeper. Me, I'll sleep when I'm dead. Or, like, tired. in reply to belle_lulu #
- http://is.gd/2rBdI – Tescos Takeover… because it's been a while and because it's Friday. #
- Also, http://is.gd/2rByH – Blair's descent into madness, & http://is.gd/2rBDl – University Challenge. #
- @RedMummy Nuh-uh. When it's pertinent, I'll announce it! It wasn't live when I tweeted about it. in reply to RedMummy #
- RE WorthAFollow: Struggling to see the distinction between that & a retweet. Still formalising something that comes natural. @RedMummy. #
- @marcellerby Yay! You're back! Rested? in reply to marcellerby #
- @thatswedishgirl Dissappointment AND regret! This is, after all, England! in reply to thatswedishgirl #
- http://is.gd/2rDUL – Just Jack: The Day I Died – chip-hop schmaltz with an Actor-enhanced, super literal video. But I like it! #
- @RedMummy Tut. in reply to RedMummy #
- http://is.gd/2rE1I – A Moth Might Look At A Butterfly. My new post at EW. Not ENTIRELY sure about this. Please read & comment, pro OR con. #
- Also, you know, retweet an' that. #
- @RedMummy Than just…? in reply to RedMummy #
- @RedMummy OK, but that's not what I said. How does it serve a different purpose than RTing people? When they're interesting or amusing? #
- @RedMummy …Never considered follow fridays valuable, so not considering them. in reply to RedMummy #
- @louhellbaby You lucky bastard. Also, I DO love that White Zombie song. Not sure about any of their others, mind…! in reply to louhellbaby #
- @RedMummy Not worried, just curious. And never deliberately obtuse. Inquisitive is all. in reply to RedMummy #
- In case it got swamped, new post up at EW – A Moth Might Look At A Butterfly. Not sure about it, so opinions welcome. http://is.gd/2rE1I #
- @RedMummy http://twitter.com/nixsight/statuses/3447333657. in reply to RedMummy #
- @acheverton Well, that was my hope…!
in reply to acheverton # - @acheverton It's on the short-list for this weekend. in reply to acheverton #
- @georgelondon Oh, nice… in reply to georgelondon #
- @georgelondon Feel oddly unsettled about sharing it, for some reason! in reply to georgelondon #
- @acheverton That looks lovely! Also, on JVCD, busy tonight. AND tomorrow night. Maybe Sat or Sun during day… in reply to acheverton #
- This office is actually freezing. Properly. Probably inhumanely. #
- @acheverton Did you say "soapy tit wank"? If not, I'm out of ideas… in reply to acheverton #
- @canuckuk Oh dear… I can't promise anything. Buddhists are great, aren't they? As to understanding, none of it is all THAT important. #
- @canuckuk A tip – I use Twitter to talk about what I'm thinking about. So if 100% comprehension is your bag you may have to dig for context. in reply to canuckuk #
- @canuckuk …it's something I always used to assume was part of other people's Twitter experience, but I've learned that ISN'T the case. in reply to canuckuk #
- @georgelondon Just Jack is oddly charming – he straddles the ground that I hadn't considered existed between The Streets and Nizlopi. in reply to georgelondon #
- @georgelondon I thought that even as I was responding! in reply to georgelondon #
- @canuckuk I just find it's easier to tweet & be damned. Or post & be damned. in reply to canuckuk #
- Most of the worst frustrations in my life revolve around places where I don't feel I can speak freely. Who needs that shit? #
- @canuckuk Funny truck not yet shown up for me! in reply to canuckuk #
- Ha! HA! Glenn Beck on "forced vacation" this week. http://is.gd/2rt0R (via @avaragado @Glinner) #
- "…despite denials from all parties … & with objective proof… someone continues to peddle this completely bogus story." @Glinner what? #
- http://is.gd/2rJqr – Nice to see Nizlopi, but next to Fern at beginning… Is that? Who IS that? @steevbishop any ideas? #
- @budgie I went out for ages with a girl who claimed to be the inspiration for the Little Goth Girl, having dated Matazone. May not be true! in reply to budgie #
- @steevbishop Ah… AHA! I KNEW I recognised him. It's… NOT the same guy as on Dead Set, is it? in reply to steevbishop #
- Have been lax updating at @Bournemouthecho. I think a swear early in the week is what done it. #
- @steevbishop I have total face-blindness when it comes to them both. Was it Andy Nyman on YHBW? in reply to steevbishop #
- @Bournemouthecho @SamShepherd If you have a sec, could you check the post I've lined up to go at 14:50? It may not be within our terms! #
- @steevbishop My main confusion came from the TOTP clip, which didn't have credit on it. Also I suspect Rufus Hound was on that OTHER show… in reply to steevbishop #
- @steevbishop …As Seen On TV? Also, I find it easier navigating your brain than the internet. Also, shut up you! in reply to steevbishop #
- RT @moonjam: In the Kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is blind. (You know… that there is a Very good point!) #
- Free products to lose the most weight in just a few weeks! http://google-mart.com #
- @steevbishop WAT? Hang on… Something happened while I was in the toilet! in reply to steevbishop #
- @steevbishop My point was that I put more faith in your brain than in Wikipedia. But more urgent issues abound. Googlemart WHAT? in reply to steevbishop #
- @steevbishop Ha! Well, yeah, but the sarcasm I'm more used to paying for! in reply to steevbishop #
The Conversation
One of the recurring problems when it comes to promoting or even supporting any new technology or idea is the fact that people tend to polarise on the subject of anything outside of their sphere of experience. Pundits will make broad and binary statements about a system, or will publish research that uses a truncated metric on systems that have multiple uses and user bases.
Or to put it more bluntly, in an effort to quantify or place a currency on new concepts or ideas, otherwise intelligent people will sometimes feel compelled to talk with authority on subjects on which they have little or no experience or working knowledge.
We all do this – it’s an ingrained part of the human condition to trust what you know, and mistrust what you don’t – so there’s no sense getting too smug about it, but it’s something that working in any tech area, where things are changing and moving forward all the time, you see constantly. It’s something of an occupational hazard.
In the case of Twitter, this has been exacerbated by the intense media hype and attention it has been under.
Graham Linehan has written a post discussing the downside of forming an opinion so publicly under these circumstances.
“Like a lot of Web 2.0, Twitter is as good as the people on it, and uninformed pieces like Jackie’s continue to fool otherwise bright people into thinking that it’s some sort of “I’m having a sandwich” announcement service. Certainly, there are people on Twitter who might use it this way…and more power to them if it makes them happy… but there are also journalists, scientists, humorists, magazines, newspapers, authors, and Samuel Johnson. There are Mums, Dads, soldiers, doctors, nurses, firemen, base jumpers, astronauts, old people, young people, builders, boxers, cops and at least one tank (don’t ask)…
…We are sharing links to thought-provoking articles, we are making each other laugh, we are keeping each other up to speed on current events…we are communicating with each other on a platform that encourages good manners, that rewards us when we’re interesting and lightly smacks our hand when we’re not.”
Ironically, Linehan and many other Twitter users are not beyond forming such rash and polarised opinions on subjects and issues, but then, that’s kind of the point. Twitter doesn’t form or deform personalities – it’s far too simple a system to do anything of the sort – all Twitter does is provide a venue for communication, and allow them to create micro, macro or meta communities for them to socialise in.
